Skip to main content

How Makerere erased our freedoms – Part 2

Three decades later, it is telling that at Makerere University, political parties have been abolished, physical campaigns and voting banned, dissenting lecturers forced to leave, and students suspended for merely holding gatherings including digital meetings. 

The bodies that used to push back against these excesses like MUASA and the Students Guild have been weakened or compromised. There has been relative peace or absence of strikes at Makerere since the new order that followed Bewatte’s death. Prof. Barnabas Nawangwe’s strict way of handling what he calls hooliganism is largely credited. But the reasons for which students and staff often carried out strikes have never gone away. Government student allowances still take a long to arrive and students are banned from holding physical campaigns. The University’s top management keeps coming for some more, from students to non-academic and academic staff, and now to even top management colleagues and the very core of academic freedom. 

A new low was registered in May 2024. The Vice Chancellor directed an inquiry into a paper set by lecturers at the School of Law and suspended the Dean’s forum pending establishing its legality. The exam challenged first-year law students on current affairs through a satirical essay depicting Speaker Anita Among responding to recent UK government sanctions.

The parody included clauses from a fictitious bill, such as a ban on adverse comments about the Speaker of Parliament, particularly regarding Among, and granting the Speaker authority to recommend individuals for prosecution to the Director of Public Prosecutions (DPP). The students were tasked with discussing all the constitutional law issues raised in the fictitious essay and critically assessing the implications of the directives, such as those from the President, on the rule of law, democratic governance, and constitutionalism. 

Edwin Karugire, the President’s son-law, who holds the powerful position of chairperson, Appointments Committee, pushed for the writing of the letter directing the inquiry, an insider told me. In the Council WhatsApp forum, Karugire insisted that such exams were unwelcome, despite resistance from other council members such as Diana Ahumuza, Kamunyu Deus, and members of top management including surprisingly, the Vice Chancellor Prof. Nawangwe. 

But the Vice-chancellor finally bowed to the pressure and the letter was released. While the University’s top management had harassed lecturers speaking up about the inefficiencies at the University, seeking to censure what lecturers do in the classroom had been unheard of. Prof Jude Sempebwa pointed out that the querying the paper set by the lecturers in the first place, in and of itself was an attack on the credibility of the lecturers that set the paper.

Then top management suspended the Deans’ Forum. “Pending resolution of the legality of this forum, all activities of the Forum are hereby suspended,” partly read the Vice Chancellor’s memo suspending the forum.  The communication was passed on directly to the rest of the Deans Forum. The Vice Chancellor who launched the forum himself was now suspending it on grounds of its “legality”.

The Dean’s Forum is an association of Dean from the 29 schools, this is a borrowed practice from other large Universities. It provides a platform for Heads of Schools to coordinate multidisciplinary and cross-cutting academic business. Strategically, the Forum forms a large share of the University’s Senate. 

One of the Deans says the suspension was politically motivated. Apart from the fact that the legal status of the Forum was not an issue when it was first established, article 29 of the constitution gives the Deans and any other Ugandan the right to associate.

The suspension of the Forum also came after the Senate voted Prof Anthony Mugisha as the Deputy Vice Chancellor of Finance and Administration (DVC F & A). Management’s preferred candidate, Prof Henry Alinaitwe was defeated. Prof Alinaitwe has been the acting DVC F & A. Prof Anthony Mugisha is the one who petitioned the Prof William Bazeyo out of office to render the position vacant.

The position of Deputy Vice Chancellor of Academic Affairs is the next. The position has since fallen vacant following the end of Prof Umar Kakumba’s first term of office. Prof Kakumba has been the Patron of the Dean’s Forum. He enjoys massive support from the Forum. Many believe that the forum was disbanded to undermine his support in the Senate.

Suspicions are rife that both the government and the Vice chancellor want Prof Kabumba out of office. His reappointment is opposed at that level. In the last council meeting, the committee charged with providing a report to guide his reappointment, presented appraisal marks below the pass mark. It turned out that marks had been picked from an incomplete appraisal process.

The report did not contain his previous appraisals from his direct supervisor, the Vice Chancellor. This infuriated the rest of the Council members who dismissed the report, calling it malicious and below the integrity standards of the Council. Some of the members of the Council claim they had accessed the real appraisal scores that had not been included in the report. 

The committee charged with the reappointment of the Deputy Vice Chancellor is comprised of the chairperson of the Appointments Committee, Edwin Karugire, the chairperson of the University Council, Lorna Magara, the vice chairperson of the University Council, Dan Kidega, and the direct supervisor, the Vice Chancellor, Prof Barnabas Nawangwe. These are the people that came up with the controversial report. 

According to the University and Other Tertiary Institutions Act, section 32 (2), upon completion of the first term, the Deputy Vice Chancellors are eligible for reappointment by the University Council, a similar provision exists for the Vice Chancellor under section 31, and it is the very basis upon which Prof Nawangwe was reappointed. It is still unclear why Prof Umar Kakumba is facing a different fate. 

Insiders claim that part of the opposition against Kabumba has to do with his religious affiliation—he is Muslim. Apparently, they fear that if Prof. Kakumba is reappointed to the DVC Academics office, he stands the highest chance to replace Prof. Nawangwe, whose term is soon expiring. Prof. Kabumba already enjoys massive support in the University Senate and the University Council too. Indeed, there are reports that top Muslim clerics have visited President Museveni to express their discontentment. 

Prof. Kakumba is also popular amongst students, having opposed the suspension of the Students Guild and the banning of political parties. As a former student leader and pro-dialogue administrator, he enjoys massive support from the rest of the university community. 

In a recent case, July 4, 2024 , Makerere University was ordered to pay shs 100 million in damages for the unfair and unwarranted denial of a post-retirement contract to  Prof John Jean Barya. While a section of the staff led by the academic staff association and the students were opposed to the management conduct of business in May 2020, the University decided to punish Prof. Barya who was vocal at the time, by not renewing his contract. He had fulfilled all the requirements as per the human resource manual and recommendations from the school of law.

This, some say, is an example of the weaponization of contracts that has since become commonplace. Many lecturers even at the Professorship level fear to speak up, afraid of losing their jobs and other entitlements. A toxic combination of self-censorship, a silenced feedback system, and a disgruntled academy resigned to poor conditions of work, has been the consequence. 

Some insiders say this partly explains the Deja Vu situation, where lecturers are on an exodus to other academic institutions in the region and on the continent at the earliest opportunity. 

A high-ranking member of the University observed that a major consequence of the current situation of both the self-censored lecturers and gagged students, is a graduate incapable of expression and questioning. 

One of the causes of all this, some say, is the membership of the first family on the University Council, the top governing body of the University.  Alionzi, a University Council member at the time Karugire joined the Council, recounted the experience and the change in dynamics in the Council room. He noted, for example, that whenever Karugire made a submission, almost everyone toed his line of argument including those that had earlier submitted different positions because everyone believed that he represented the voice of his mother-in-law, Janet Museveni, who is also the Minister of Education and President Museveni’s wife, and or the President, even if he was giving his individual opinion. Some of the Council members are public servants, who never wanted to cross his path because the fate of their jobs was in his hands, or they felt so. 

Karugire was appointed chairperson of the University Appointments Committee just one week after his confirmation as a member of the University Council. Some like Alionzi felt that the position needed someone with experience in the University setting. Additionally, the chairperson of the University Council, Lorna Magara, is a sister to Allen Kagina, and has known ties to the first lady. Given these powerful positions, many feel that the interests of government, which are not always congruent with those of the other stakeholders including the public, will always carry the day. The recent incident of inquiring into the constitutional law exam is a classic example.

How Uganda tried to silence #March2Parliament protests

“I expected to be killed. I expected to be raped,” said Aloikin Praise Opoloje, a few days after she was released from detention on bail in August this year. 

The 25-year-old law student had been arrested, along with dozens of others, after taking part in an anti-corruption protest in Kampala on 23 July. During the arrest, one male police officer had put his hands between her legs and squeezed her genitals. Female officers had pulled her ponytail backwards and throttled her. 

But the worst was yet to come. At the Central Police Station in Kampala, where most of the arrestees were temporarily held, officers attacked Opoloje and her companions, slapping, kicking and hitting them with batons all over their bodies. 

“These are the ones distracting [sic] the peace that we have here?” one officer asked rhetorically. “Who has paid you to protest?”

That day alone, over 100 protestors, mostly young people, were arrested, denied bail and detained for close to two weeks. Uganda’s president, Yoweri Museveni, ministers, and social media accounts belonging to ruling party supporters all claimed that the protestors had been funded by foreign actors to bring down the government. 

AGORA and IWPR have interviewed a dozen protesters arrested on 23 July, who – like Opoloje – all gave accounts of being physically abused in detention. Some suffered serious injuries that they have yet to recover from. They deny any link to foreign funding and say they merely wanted to state their opposition to corruption in Uganda – which ranks 141st among the 180 countries in Transparency International’s annual Corruption Perceptions Index. 

Instead, they say, they were systematically abused and labelled enemies of Uganda. To date, none of the alleged perpetrators have been held accountable. 

Playing with fire 

Like many Ugandans, Opoloje was enraged by revelations earlier this year that government officials had been siphoning off billions of dollars’ worth of public funds for their own personal use. But the fact that parliament’s speaker and deputy speaker had procured generators for their homes at inflated prices made it personal: at the start of the year, Opoloje had given birth in a rural hospital, where she and her baby almost died due to shortages and a power cut. 

Opoloje started making videos about corruption and posting them on her social media accounts. She made contact with other like-minded young people, organising discussions on X/Twitter Spaces to generate ideas on how to protest. 

As a law student, Opoloje scrupulously suggested that they notify the police of their intent to protest. On 12 July, inspired partly by Kenya’s protests against the cost of living, the group wrote to the Kampala Metropolitan Police, saying they intended to lead a demonstration to parliament. Their key demand was that the speaker, Anita Among, resign. 

The police responded by threatening them and ordering them not to hold the protest. On 21 July, President Museveni warned the activists that they would be “playing with fire” if they went ahead.

“But by then,” Opoloje said, “I had no returning point. We had our demands and those were our demands: Anita must resign.”

Surrounded

On the day itself, Opoloje and a group of 25 others gathered at Garden City shopping mall, a few hundred metres away from parliament. Within minutes, police were deployed in the area. Suspecting that someone had tipped off the authorities, the group separated and moved to another street close to parliament. They pulled out their placards and started protesting. 

Police officers who had been trailing them quickly surrounded them and started making arrests. Throughout the day, other youths who had gathered in other parts of the city were also rounded up in the same way as they tried to protest.

It was after the arrests, at the Central Police Station, that mistreatment began in earnest. George Victor Otieno, another university student, tried to reason with officers, explaining that corruption cost Uganda dearly and resulted in government employees like themselves being badly paid.

“Why are you making a lot of noise here? Keep quiet,” shouted a senior officer. He barked out an order: “Take this gentleman away.” 

Otieno, Opoloje and other arrestees later identified the senior officer as Joel Ntabu, commander of the Kampala Metropolitan Police criminal investigations directorate, after his picture appeared on social media.

When the group arrived at the police station, having heard countless reports of torture in the cells, they had devised a plan to stay together. They held onto each other in order to stop officers from separating them.

Ntabu ordered several policemen to come and drag Otieno to one of the rooms. He also ordered that Opoloje be taken to another room.

“Make sure you do everything he tells you to do, because if you don’t do it, he’s going to kill you,” a female police officer told her. Despite being terrified, the student plucked up her courage.

“I asked: ‘Why would he kill me? What have I done wrong?’” Opoloje told us. “I said: ‘I have done nothing wrong. I am just protesting, which is my constitutional right.’”

In the secluded room, Ntabu immediately started slapping Opoloje. There were some benches and tables in one corner of the room. Ntabu pushed her into the tables, pulled her back and started slapping her again. She just kept crying and looking at him. 

Later, another officer brought her a sheet of paper on which to make a statement. But by this time, Opoloje said, she had been beaten so much she was no longer afraid. 

She declined to make a statement, insisting that she could only do this in the presence of her lawyer. Infuriated, the police officers led by Ntabu decided to take her to another room and torture her some more.

As they were taking her, she saw Otieno again. He was lying on the floor, his shirt in tatters, and a police officer was kicking him. 

“This man subjected me to a kind of torture I could only imagine, the kind of Russian-style thing that you see and hear people speaking of,” Otieno told us.

He said that the officers demanded he make a statement admitting he was being funded by foreign organisations and that he worked closely with Bobi Wine, Uganda’s leading opposition politician – who Otieno had never even met. 

“I was showered with beatings of batons. To date I have marks on my body,” he said. “I was kicked in my genitals while I was in that office. I lost my breath to the point that I was almost ready to give up and do everything they were telling me.”

Otieno added that most of his fellow arrestees were treated in the same manner.

 “Very bad things”

Reports of cruel treatment started emerging on X/Twitter the day after the protesters were arrested, from friends and family who had visited them in detention. Initially denied bail, most arrestees were released a fortnight later amid mounting public pressure. 

All 12 protesters who spoke to us named Commander Ntabu as a key perpetrator. Luke Owoyesigyire, the deputy spokesperson for Kampala Metropolitan Police, denied that Ntabu was involved. He told journalists on 5 August that Ntabu’s role was limited to supervising case files and that he does not conduct interrogations. 

Most of the arrestees, however, say Ntabu beat them up while trying to force them to make statements in the absence of their lawyers. Rather than offer to conduct a criminal investigation into their treatment, Kampala Metropolitan Police has advised the protesters to make a formal complaint to the Uganda Human Rights Commission. 

Eron Kiiza, a human rights lawyer who specialises in police violence cases and who is representing some of the protesters, said that the claims of mistreatment already made public should have been enough to prompt an investigation. 

“If police heard from the public that there was a terrorist group in a certain area,” Kiiza asked, “Would they sit back and wait for a formal complaint? The job of police is to detect crime, investigate it and apprehend the culprits. In this case the police know what happened, but they are simply not interested.”

Gideon Nova Kwikiriza, president of the activist group Ugandans on X, who was also arrested and beaten up in the cells, pointed out the irony that in other circumstances Ugandans can be arrested on the basis of social media posts.

“Why do you consider my complaint not formal when it is on X? Yet you use X to arrest people?” he said. 

On 25 July, Museveni issued a statement congratulating the security forces for halting the protests. He claimed that protesters were receiving foreign funding and that some had been planning “very bad” things against the people of Uganda. 

“Those very bad things will come out in court when those arrested are being tried,” said the president. “The evidence in court will shock many.” 

Two female police officers arrest Aloikin Praise Opoloje on September 2 2o24. It was the second time she was attempting to march to parliament in a protest against corruption. © Haggai Matsiko/IWPR/Agora

Physical and mental scars

So far, the evidence Museveni claimed to have access to has not materialised. The protesters continue to regularly appear in court as they await trial on charges of “common nuisance” – a colonial-era law that can carry a punishment of imprisonment for one year. 

Meanwhile, they must battle the physical and mental scars of their experiences. Opoloje has a mark on her neck from where her hair was pulled; Otieno says he now gets migraines. Kennedy Makana, another arrestee, said he developed hearing problems after being double-slapped on the ears. Yet another, Sadat Mugweri, is currently receiving treatment in a mental health facility. 

“He told me they would pour cold water and beat him while in detention,” Mugweri’s mother told us in a phone call, explaining that he had already been battling mental health issues before the protest. “That treatment worsened his situation.” 

Of the entire group of more than 100 people, Sammy Okanya is the most unfortunate. Badly beaten after his arrest, he has been denied bail four times and is still detained awaiting trial.

After a recent court hearing, we managed to visit Okanya in the holding cells. “I cannot currently hold urine because of the way I was tortured,” he said, adding that he had contracted tuberculosis while in prison. 

His lawyer, Ishaq Olega, said that he has asked the court to release Okanya and have his alleged abusers arrested, but his request was declined. “Everything is being handled with impunity,” he said. 

Okanya believes he is being singled out because he is a vocal critic of Museveni. “They want to instill fear in people that if they challenge the government they will be treated the same way I have been treated,” he said. 

This hasn’t deterred everyone from protesting, however. On 2 September, Opoloje and two other women, Norah Kobusingye and Kemitoma Kyenzibo, marched naked towards parliament with their bodies covered in anti-corruption messages. They were immediately arrested, charged with being a public nuisance, detained, and released on bail 10 days later. 

Yet Opoloje remains defiant. “Enough is enough,” she said. “If I lose anything, I’m willing to lose it if I can add a stone to the building of a better country of Uganda.”

This story was produced as part of a collaboration between AGORA and the Institute for War & Peace Reporting (IWPR)

Poor fishing communities targeted and discriminated against on L.Victoria

A year after his arrest by the Fish Protection Unit of the Uganda People’s Defence Forces (UPDF), Moses Musitwa was still paying off debts he incurred to get out of prison when we interviewed him for this story in April this year.  

Musitwa, a resident of Buyange Island, had been picked from his bed on a cold night in March 2023, alongside other fishermen from Bubeke Sub-county in Kalangala District, following a protest intended to overthrow an association leader of the silver fish (mukene) community. 

The fishermen accused leaders of Bubeke Sub-county of conniving with the UPDF and the wealthier Nile Perch and tilapia fishing communities, to introduce rules that would disadvantage those with licences for silver fish, commonly known as mukene.    

“They wanted us to only fish for just a few hours after midnight,” revealed Robert Ssebuguzi, a leader of mukene fishermen on Buyange Island.

Following new rules that would limit access to Lake Victoria, Ssebugizi says mukene fishermen had no choice but to try and replace their leader, who had abandoned his role representing the people that elected him. 

The UPDF reacted by branding the protesters National Unity Platform (NUP) supporters, seeking to cause political instability. The army proceeded to arrest all the fishermen from their homes, the night after the protest.  

The arrests are part of the diverse actions taken by different government officials to sabotage fishers of mukene, explains Ssebugizi, in favour of the bigger fishing community and particularly those who invested in Nile Perch, which is an important contributor to Uganda’s foreign exchange.    

Fish and its products contributed $140 million (Ush526.6 billion) to Uganda’s export receipts in 2023, with the Nile Perch as the biggest source of this income, according to Bank of Uganda statistics. Nile Perch is considered a major foreign exchange earner alongside gold, coffee and maize, which in turn partly explains the stringent government policy on fishing standards.  

Dr Robert Kayanda, the Fisheries Director at Lake Victoria Fisheries Organisation (LVFO), says the high export receipts mean the Nile Perch fishing community has more resources and an educated mass better equipped to organise and push its interests.  

“The Nile Perch association is well organised, rich and even able to call the President [of Uganda] when they need to,” Kayanda explains.

Other users on Lake Victoria and particularly the poor fishermen and dealers in mukene, and not as well organised, on the other hand, end up suffering because they cannot afford similar access to local government and national level policy makers.

“The mukene people are looked at as poor and so government is willing to pay attention to the Nile Perch people who want the lake to themselves so that they can drift, with no trouble,” Kayanda adds. 

He says that with many mukene fishermen on the lake, the big fish players cannot drift over large swathes of the lake uninterrupted. Drifting is difficult if not impossible, as mukene fishermen cut nets of anyone disrupting their own fishing. Indeed, this has been the source of friction and harassment of people like Musitwa and the majority at Buyange Island.  

Moses Kabuusu, the Member of Parliament for Kyamuswa County in Kalangala, a constituency that includes Bubeke Sub-county, revealed that many of the fishermen arrested alongside Musitwa even admitted to the trumped up charges against them, which made leaving jail difficult. 

FPU’s history on the Lake and its changing enforcement practices 

The cohort of mukene fishers from Bubeke were arrested under the FPU regime headed by Col Dick Kirya Kaija. For most of 2023, the UPDF would arrest fishers from their homes, have them charged in either Kalangala, Kampala, Mbale or Masaka, which often meant being far away from anyone that could stand surety or even bring food to the prisoner. 

“That is why I did my best to borrow and sell everything I could to make sure I left jail before being moved out of Kalangala,” says Musitwa, who spent a month in prison.    

Luckily, Kabuusu says the new FPU team under Lt Col Mercy Tukahirwa was doing things differently. Now the remaining concern is the UPDF’s inconsistence in applying fishing standards and extortion of bribes from the fishing community. 

Lt Lauben Ndifula, the FPU spokesperson, disputes these allegations. She says the complaining fishermen are likely wrongdoers, released at the mercy of the solders enforcing standards on the lake.   

First mooted in November 2015, following a decision to disband the fish enforcement body from the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries, the UPDF’s FPU was supposed to restore sanity on lakes so that fish stocks could increase. Increased stocks would ensure full factory capacity returns to a time when annual export receipts from fish and its products stood at $400 million (Ush1.5 trillion). 

At the time of the FPU’s formation, Uganda’s export receipts stood at $150 million (Ush570.5 billion). The figure stood at $140 million in 2023. This means that despite the UPDF’s human rights violations against the fishing community, stocks and export receipts have not changed significantly over the last eight years. 

However, according to Kayanda, the Fisheries Director at LVFO, an organisation that coordinates East African partner states in the development of fisheries and aquaculture, the one advantage of the UPDF on the lake is that they can prevent their colleagues from fueling trade in immature fish.

“Senior army officers used to help in the cross-border trade of immature fish and the civilian force could never have stopped them,” says Kayanda. 

According to the 2022, Lake Victoria hydro-acoustic survey, through which LVFO measures fish stocks, there were 736,683 tonnes of Nile Perch in Lake Victoria. The report also noted that the size structure of Nile Perch in Lake Victoria was dominated by the smaller sizes.

“This could be attributed to concentrating fishing efforts on big size,” reads an excerpt from the report. 

When compared to the 2021 survey, the Nile Perch stocks were 34 percent lower, with the highest reduction registered in Tanzania, while Uganda registered a slight increase.  

Despite a slight increase in the fish stocks on Uganda’s side of Lake Victoria, Kabuusu, observes that it has not been adequate as evidenced by the low export receipts, under capacity production of fish factories, and the regular complaints from the fishing community.

 He adds that the main explanation for Uganda’s failure to stabilise fish stocks is the arbitrariness that has characterised the FPU over the years. 

“If existing policies on fishing were implemented consistently, and with uniformity, certainly fish stocks would have already come back,” says Kabuusu. 

Since its establishment, FPU has been managed by three different regimes, starting with the first one under Lt James Nuwagaba, who made himself a name as one of the most brutal enforcers of fishing standards. 

Lt Nuwagaba would reportedly only report to the President and ignored every other leader whether minister, Member of Parliament or local government.   

“He and the soldiers under him had the latitude to do many things, including using torture and brutality,” Kabuusu says, “They scared, scarred, crippled, and even killed. They shot at people and nobody was questioned.”

Led by Rebecca Kadaga, the Speaker of Parliament between 2016 and 2021, parliamentarians demanded accountability from the UPDF but this did not stop the torture of fishermen by the team under Lt Nuwagaba. 

Since the executive did nothing to hold FPU under Lt Nuwagaba accountable, the NRM was punished at the polls. 

“Most of the NRM Members of Parliament lost the elections because of the failure to intervene when the army officers were violating rights of people,” Kabuusu says. 

“In my constituency, I was out of Parliament, I found people with wounds from live ammunition and others had been killed by boats.”

The executive finally listened to the people’s cry and replaced Lt Nuwagaba, who had been FPU boss since January 2017, just before the 2021 general elections.

According to the fishing community, Lt. Col. Dick Kaija did bring some sanity to the FPU’s work around controlling illegal fishing. 

“There was no burning and torching of houses like it was in the Nuwagaba era, but still, he failed to stop his people from taking money from the fishermen,” says Kabuusu. 

Coupled with the extortionist tendencies was the decision to arrest and hold fishermen far away from home—in Mbale, Masaka and Kitalya, among other places. Kaija’s other challenge was that the other officers with whom he had been appointed had too much power and would ignore him. 

“I cannot fault Lt. Colonel Dick Kaija, but you would even wonder if his team was actually under his command,” Kabuusu explains, “It was common to find junior staff at the rank of captain that didn’t take orders from their senior commander.” 

New mukene fishing rule

Kaija has since been replaced with Lt. Col. Mercy Tukahiirwa, under whom cases of arresting people in the night and holding them in far-flung places have reduced. 

However, the fishing community say the corruption and enforcement of policies that favour those fishing Nile Perch, still exists. They cite the case where the FPU connived with the Association of Fishers and Lake Users Uganda (AFALU) to convince the Minister of State for Fisheries to pass a law that makes fishing mukene unprofitable.   

At the beginning of the year, Hellen Adoa, the Minister of State for Fisheries announced a review of the fishing methods of mukene from hurry-up method to chota-chota method. 

Lt. Ndifula, the FPU spokesperson, explains that the hurry-up method, banned in February 2024, applies a long net that can cover up to 100 metres in length and with a depth that can go up to between nine and fifteen panels. 

“It is long and they have been using them. When they are doing the fishing, they pull that net and you find the mesh size is about 5, 6 millimetres,” says Ndifula. The right mesh size for mukene is supposed to be between 8 and 10 millimetres, says Ndifula. 

Consequently, the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Industry and Fisheries, decided to innovate backwards, and return the mukene fishing community to the more traditional chota-chota method. 

“With Chota chota design, a net is circular, cannot be long, as it is can be about 8 feet in length,” he says. 

Ndifula says the UPDF sampled ten boats of mukene in Kiyindi, Buikwe and found all types of fish. 

“We tried to count and you find that ten boats have come up with 3000 young Nile Perch and numerous tilapia,” Ndifula explains, noting that the UPDF found that mukene fishing was harming young tilapia and Nile Perch and compromising stocks on Lake Victoria.

Ndifula, however, notes that fishermen have told the UPDF enforcement team that chota-chota is primitive and dysfunctional in the current economic conditions. 

Additionally, Madi Ssebaduka, a mukene fisherman, says that it is the Ministry of Agriculture, Animal Husbandry and Fisheries working with its supporting agencies that taught fishermen to use the hurry-up method. Under the current economic circumstances, where one needs ten to 30 jerry cans of fuel to power a night of fishing, he adds, chota-chota is just impractical.

“It is like they have asked us to cut off one of our legs,” Ssebaduka says of the new regulations. 

The new regulations are not what the mukene fishing community needs, says Kayanda. Instead, it would be better for Uganda to encourage Mukene fishers to invest in equipment that takes advantage of the deeper parts of Lake Victoria. 

According to the Lake Victoria hydro-acoustic survey for 2022, Uganda has the highest mukene stocks owing to failure to adequately invest in deeper water fishing technologies.  Unlike Kenya, Uganda also has a large section of Lake Victoria and this has helped in safeguarding mukene stocks. Since Tanzania, with the biggest portion of Lake Victoria has lower than Uganda’s mukene stocks, size is not the only explanation.

On most complaints, made by AFULU, which include that the Mukene fishing community uses solar lights to allegedly chase Nile Perch to Kenya and Tanzania, Kayanda says these same technologies are employed in all the countries that share Lake Victoria. 

Kayanda says instead of forcing mukene fishers to cut on their capacity, encouraging deeper fishing and penalising those found fishing close to the lakeshores where breeding happens, would be a better option.

‘Worse than business as usual’: EU overlooks Uganda’s attack on human rights

The European Union claims to stand up for human rights, the rule of law, transparency in government and peaceful, democratic elections. Yet in recent years it has allowed one of its partners, Uganda, to repeatedly violate these ideals.

In 2020 and 2021, President Yoweri Museveni’s government oversaw the most violent election cycle in Ugandan history. At least 54 people were killed during campaign season, more than any election season before. When the dust was settled, Museveni secured his sixth term and 35th year in power.

In January 2021, Parliament passed the repressive 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act into law and was soon after embroiled in a series of corruption and embezzlement scandals. In July 2024, over 100 young people were arrested and charged for peacefully marching against corruption and wanton expenditures by the government – in what constitutional lawyers have condemned as a violation of their right to peaceful assembly.

The EU has previously withheld funds for countries where human rights have been abused; suspending financial support for Niger following last year’s coup, and for Ethiopia in late 2020 amid the atrocities being committed by the government in the Tigray war. In 2013, it cancelled €13m of aid to Gambia over a lack of progress in human rights, in part because of a law against homosexuality. In each of these instances, the EU eventually resumed its flow of aid after apparently being satisfied that change was on the horizon.

But it has seemingly turned a blind eye to the egregious state acts that threaten human rights, freedoms and lives in Uganda – including the killing of protesters, arbitrary detention of political dissidents and prevalent infringement on LGBTIQ rights. Publicly, the EU has only issued statements of concern, with an official telling openDemocracy that the rights violations against Uganda’s queer community were “not assessed” to be “widespread and systematic”.

Uganda is an increasingly important trade and development partner for the EU. The East African country’s exports to the bloc have grown from €500m in 2020 to more than €800m today, and in March the EU announced it will allocate €200m of investment for Uganda under its Global Gateway project, which aims to mobilise €300bn for development projects in partner states by 2027.

Since 2017, the EU has also supported humanitarian action in Uganda with an aid package of more than €309m. This year it allocated a further €27.5m for aid in the country, according to the European Commission’s website.
Suspending aid to Uganda would “deprive the most vulnerable populations, including LGBTIQ persons, from vital support. Disengagement by the EU would also create gaps which may be further filled by other players who do not share EU values,” said EU Commissioner for International Partnerships Jutta Urpilainen in a September 2023 statement.

Violations against LGBTIQ Ugandans not “systematic or widespread” enough
In May 2023, Uganda passed one of the world’s harshest anti-gay laws, the 2023 Anti-Homosexuality Act (AHA). People found guilty of homosexual acts face life imprisonment under the law, which also introduced the death penalty for so-called “aggravated” cases, such as gay sex with someone below the age of 18 or where someone has a sexually transmitted terminal illness.

The EU’s public response to the AHA was a mildly critical statement. On the day it became law, EU high representative on foreign affairs Joseph Borrel warned that the Ugandan government must “…protect all of its citizens and uphold their basic rights. Failure to do so will undermine relationships with international partners”.

Since then, more than 90 people have been charged under the AHA, says Ugandan human rights promotion and legal aid organisation, the Human Rights Awareness and Promotion Forum (HRAPF). LGBTIQ Ugandans have also suffered at least 1,031 incidents of human rights abuses and rights violations – including breaches of their rights to freedom from torture and abuse – according to a recent report by Convening For Equality, a Ugandan LGBTIQ rights-focused campaign group.

The EU has the power to sanction Ugandan government officials over these abuses using the Global Human Rights Sanctions Regime (GHRSR). This mechanism would allow the bloc to invoke travel bans, freeze bank accounts, and forbid EU businesses and governments from making funds available to sanctioned individuals or non-governmental entities.

It was adopted by the EU Foreign Affairs Council in December 2020 as a way to hold individuals and entities from non-EU countries responsible for “widespread, systematic” and “serious” human rights violations.

The GHRSR has so far been applied to individuals in countries including Russia, China and South Sudan over a range of human rights abuses, although none related to LGBTIQ rights.
The EU’s stance on Uganda, however, appears to be that there haven’t been enough human rights abuses in the country to warrant intervention via the GHRSR.

The violations against Uganda’s queer community did not meet the criteria for sanctions, according to Guilliame Chartrain, the deputy ambassador of the EU delegation to Uganda, in an interview.

“At least if we refer to the AHA, the adoption by a Parliament of a law is not in itself enough as a legal basis [for implementing the GHRSR], it has to produce systematic and widespread effects. The assessment is that Uganda is not in this situation today,” Chartrain said.
It appears things would have to get worse for queer Ugandans before the EU would act. In the absence of targeted sanctions, the EU has increased funding for civil society to respond to victims of the AHA, according to Cathal Gilbert, the human rights officer at the EU delegation in Uganda. The EU and Germany last year allocated €15m for civil society organisations, non-governmental organisations and human rights defenders in Uganda.

The EU argues that its approach is to deal directly (and privately) with the government. “We believe in more direct engagement… without giving the impression that we are publicly interfering into what is in reality, a judicial Ugandan process,” Gilbert told openDemocracy, referring to an ongoing case at the Ugandan Supreme Court challenging the anti-gay law.

The US Congress, on the other hand, last month took a public stance against the AHA. It introduced a resolution that criticised “Uganda’s undemocratic human rights regression” and supported sanctions that the US Department of State in May 2024 imposed on five former and current Ugandan government and military officials over allegations of corruption and extrajudicial killings by the Ugandan army.

In its resolution, Congress condemned the “criminalisation and draconian punishments regarding consensual same-sex sexual conduct and so-called ‘promotion of homosexuality’” and backed a “reduction of support” to Uganda “until the Anti-Homosexuality Act is repealed”.

Arming acts of suppression
Under the EU’s 2008 arms trade policy, member states are legally bound to carefully consider whether any weapons and other military equipment they sell might be used for “internal repression”. This can include “torture and other cruel, inhuman and degrading treatment, disappearances, arbitrary detentions and other major violations of human rights and fundamental freedoms”.

Yet the EU and its member states are crucial partners to the Ugandan army, providing it with military training and equipment. Six EU members – Austria, Bulgaria, Croatia, Czech Republic, France and Poland – sold military equipment worth €50m to Uganda in 2022, according to Chatrain. Between 2020 and 2022, EU states also exported ammunition worth €208m to Uganda.

Uganda’s army plays a crucial role in Museveni’s violence and coercive machinery, which aims to repress opposition politicians and protesters, particularly during election years.

At least 54 people were killed and many more injured by armed police and military in November 2020 when riots erupted in support of then-opposition presidential candidate Bobi Wine (real name Robert Kyagulanyi). Wine had been arrested over an alleged violation of Covid-19-related social distancing measures less than two months before the January 2021 election.
Wine’s party, the National Unity Platform (NUP), says that more than three years later there has been no justice for the victims of the riots or for the 28 NUP supporters who have also been held in prison awaiting trial since June 2021, without the option of bail. The supporters, who are all civilians, were charged with illegal weapons possession and their cases will be heard by a military court.

Weeks after the election, the EU Parliament passed a resolution calling for accountability for human rights violations in Uganda, including the 2021 election violence. It recommended sanctioning the perpetrators under the EU Magnitsky Act, a mechanism that allows sanctions to be brought against foreigners involved in human rights abuses.

Nothing came of the resolution. Chartrain, the EU ambassador, told openDemocracy that EU Parliament resolutions are not binding, but are taken into consideration by the EU delegation to Uganda as they “reflect the values and the priorities of the EU citizens”.

It has taken no further action. In May, EU ambassador to Uganda Jan Sadek posted pictures of his meeting with Muhoozi Kainerugaba, the country’s chief of defence forces and President Museveni’s son, on X (formerly Twitter). The timing was uncanny. Hours earlier, the US had announced it would be sanctioning five Ugandan officials over allegations of corruption and extrajudicial killings by the Ugandan army.

“Those pictures coming in on the same day [the US] took action raises questions about if the EU also disagrees with what the Ugandan government is doing,” said Agather Atuhaire, one of the Ugandan activist journalists who exposed graft and corruption schemes in government. The EU previously recognised Atuhaire’s work, awarding her the prestigious 2023 EU Human Rights Defender Award.

In 2022, exiled Ugandan author and activist Kakwenza Rukirabashaija claimed that Kainerugaba was present during his forced detention and his torture in a military prison in December 2021. And in July 2022 the Guardian reported that the International Criminal Court (ICC) received a petition that included the testimonies of 215 Ugandans accusing Museveni and Kainerugaba of torturing political dissidents in “secret detention centres” during the 2021 election period.

Chartrain, the deputy EU ambassador, told openDemocracy that the EU does not have a legal mechanism for sanctioning countries or individuals for corruption, and added that the accusations against Kainerugaba have not been proven.

“[He] was not named in the sanctions imposed by the Americans, and according to the feedback that we got from the ICC, there are no open cases concerning Uganda,” Chartrain said. “There are no concrete elements today that could factor into our decision to engage with the Ugandan authorities.”

The NUP told openDemocracy that the petition is ongoing and the ICC may take years to decide whether to investigate.

Is the EU pussyfooting?
Human rights campaigners told openDemocracy that the EU has outright refused to reexamine its relationship with the Ugandan government. “For their own interests… they don’t want to be seen to be too hard on the Ugandan government,” said a past recipient of the EU Human Rights Defender Award, who spoke to openDemocracy on the condition of anonymity.

“It is worse than business as usual. It’s the air of promotion that Uganda is a place where European corporations should come and invest. That’s leverage that [the EU is] creating for an administration that wants LGBTQ+ people to disappear. That’s an astonishing position for a political entity,” said Asia Russell, the executive director of Health GAP, an international organisation pushing for universal access to medical treatment for people with HIV.

In the past, the EU has acted more decisively on Uganda. In 2012, it suspended funding for the country after $13m of aid for refugee settlements was found to have been embezzled through the prime minister’s office. In 2018, Germany withheld €100m of funding for the Ugandan government, demanding accountability for officials implicated in a UN audit that uncovered corruption in Uganda’s refugee scheme.

In a letter dated 16 April 2024, Convening for Equality, a Ugandan LGBTIQ-focused campaign group called for a review of EU funding to Uganda, suggesting that the EU should pause or redirect any funds going through government entities or essential humanitarian support to non-government organisations committed to providing services to and employing LGBTIQ people.

Gilbert of the EU delegation in Uganda responded by saying: “Less than 5% of the funding that we provide in Uganda goes to the government. Almost all of our development cooperation is channelled through development agencies, UN bodies or civil society. So removing that funding is not going to be a hit on the treasury of [Uganda].”

In response to openDemocracy on whether there are considerations for funding to the Ugandan government to be rerouted, the EU Commission said it “deeply regrets” the April 2024 constitutional court ruling that upheld most of the AHA.

It added: “We will continue to follow the implementation of the law and engaging on human rights issues with the Ugandan authorities and civil society as part of our longstanding and broad-based partnership with the country to ensure that all Ugandan citizens, regardless of their sexual orientation and gender identity, are protected and treated equally, with dignity and respect.”

On the 2020-21 election violence, the Commission said: “The EU has expressed both publicly and in our direct contacts with the Ugandan government its concerns about human rights violations in Uganda, including regarding the violence around the 2021 elections. We believe in maintaining an open channel with the government to address these issues constructively.”

The EU’s position is reflective of age-old colonial and imperial power dynamics, says journalist and feminist Rosebell Kagumire, and as such the continental bloc is unlikely to change its stance any time soon.

“African countries are still being extracted, in so many ways. The EU maintaining the leaders that do not serve our countries, but serve them and the small privileged few is one of the most glaring symptoms and manifestations of this,” she said.

How Makerere erased our freedoms

It is 7:00pm July 14, 2022. Despite the onset of darkness, hundreds of students are moving on all university roads, chanting their candidates’ names. On the road from Livingstone Hall to Mitchell Hall alone, about 10 bands draped in different colours of different political parties, are singing all tribes of names and sounds. Kadodi (the Gishu traditional dance) is the most dominant.

Suddenly, there is gloom. News is circulating that at Northcote, a student has been stabbed. Minutes later, it is confirmed that Betungura Bewatte, a Uganda Christian University student, has succumbed to the stabbing. Betungura had studied at Mbarara High School with Tukamushaba Justus, the Forum for Democratic Change party candidate in the Students’ Guild presidential race. He had joined the campaign trail to support his friend.

His death is an unprecedented disaster. The Student Guild election campaigns at Makerere had always been peaceful. The final campaign day was always like a mega festival with students giving a final push of support for their candidates. Even students (like Betungura) from other universities, most of whom were close associates of candidates, youths, and politicians, from political parties all joined the campaign trails.

But on this day, all students are engulfed by a mixture of shock and fear. The public is outraged and the incident is immediately politicised.

As different camps blame each other for the incident, police swing into action arresting even those that helped take Betungura to hospital. The nation is looking to the University Management for answers.

At about 11:00pm, four hours after news of Betungura’s death, the University Council chairperson, Lorna Magara, releases a letter with three directives. The ongoing election is suspended indefinitely; the Students’ Guild is also suspended with immediate effect (this includes the Guild caretaker government and the Students Common Room (leadership of residential halls); and lastly, Management will investigate the cases of violence in the electoral campus and report to the council for appropriate action. 

The writing is on the wall: the university management is going to teach students a lesson.

Alionzi Lawrence alias Dangote, the National Unity Platform (NUP) candidate, was poised to win the election (he eventually becomes Guild President after the resumption of the electoral exercise). A sensational campaign song composed by his team had taken social media by storm. What did the death of Betungura Bewatte mean in terms of freedoms at the University? “Everything, everything changed,” Alionzi responded in his quintessential Lugbara accent when I asked him early this year as I did interviews for this story.

Prof Jude Sempebwa, the General Secretary of Makerere University Academic Staff Association (MUASA), would later tell me the same thing.

Following Ms Lorna Magara’s letter, student representatives were kicked out of the University Council and removed from the caretaker government. The caretaker government was the temporary student leadership that existed during election time. 

On July 29, 2022, two weeks after the University Council suspended the Guild, the students decided to form a select committee to push for the restoration of the Students’ Guild. The first meeting was held on Google Meet. This is where the concerned students chose the select committee representatives.  The meeting was held on a Friday. The following Monday, August 1, 2022, Namwoza Sulaiman, a third-year student of Medicine and Surgery and Speaker of Lumumba Hall who convened that meeting, was suspended.  “It is alleged that you made resolutions tantamounting to misinforming fellow students as well as directing the University Council to reinstate the student Guild, senior common room, and all student leadership structures,” reads part of the suspension letter he received from Vice Chancellor. 

Kabulwa Muzafalu, a student of Journalism and the host of ‘Out Of The Box’ X Space was also threatened severally by the University Management for hosting controversial discussions about the university. He received messages and phone calls from senior officials including from the Vice Chancellor’s office warning him against conducting certain discussions or hosting certain critical voices on his X Space. These senior officials even contacted his lecturers to further exert pressure. But his lecturers defended him saying hosting controversial discussions was a central part of the journalism they were teaching him. 

After the suspension of Sula, as he was commonly known, I took over the leadership of the select committee. I had been its spokesperson. Along with Luyomba Kelvin, the General Secretary to the committee, and other concerned students, we decided to come up with more creative but less risky ways to voice the students’ concerns. 

We organised prayers at the university’s Freedom Square, and invited heads of the Anglican, Catholic and Islamic faiths at the university to lead the prayers. The prayers were fairly attended by students. The Reverends and the Iman did not attend. The following day, the warden of Mitchell Hall, where I was residing, called me to his office.

He seemed to have grown fond of me as one of the disciplined but influential student leaders. Our interactions were always warm. But on this occasion, I saw a different man—he looked worried and had no time for the usual pleasantries. Instead, immediately I entered, he pulled out a letter from the drawer of his desk. It was a warning letter – the last warning! There had been a few warnings before over student organizing related activities. But this time, I was being warned for organising prayers!

The famous Freedom Square was no longer free. Even before the incident of the student’s death, three Guild Presidential candidates had been struck out of the Guild Presidential race for holding what was termed an illegal assembly at Freedom Square. 

The Square was even fenced off. Students had to write to the office of the Deputy Vice Chancellor of Finance and Administration DVC F&A to access it. The three candidates had been punished for not following this procedure. 

One of the victims, Mwesigwa Mugambya Calvin was a tall, notable medical student, who enjoyed massive support. His efforts to petition the Vice Chancellor and the University Council came to naught.  He finally gave up and decided to back Alionzi, who had at the time stood for the post of Nsibirwa Hall chairman.

Aftermath of Bewatte’s death, the university did not only stop at the three directives. The university established the Student Constitutional Committee to come up with a new students’ Guild constitution. This new constitution would address students’ issues. The students opposed this move. They argued that a new Guild leadership ought to have been voted into power and charged with reviewing the constitution and then amendments could be made by a leadership with a legitimate and popular mandate. 

But the University Council went on with this committee. The committee was formed by law students, largely detached from the mainstream student leadership, who seemed excited about the idea of making a constitution, and whose other claim to this role were familial ties and connections to members of the university top management. 

For instance, the chair of that committee was a son to Dr Kiggundu Muhammad, former university Public Relations Officer under Prof. Nawangwe. The young man had been a close friend. He had even called to consult me as to whether he should join the committee after administrators had called him and asked him to join. I discouraged him from standing against the students to extend the interests of the administration. I also told him that despite our friendship, I would lead the effort to oppose him and the entire scheme.

A few days after our conversation, he went ahead and took up the position. He is now an aide to Prof. Sarah Ssali, a member of the University Council, representing the Senate. Other members of that committee have since been awarded jobs in different university offices or placements for graduate studies for a job well done.

The committee came up with new changes, which included banning political parties at the university campus, putting the Dean of Students at the centre of organising the student elections, thereby taking power from the students, banning first-year students from standing for any Guild leadership positions, among others. 

The state of political rights and the capacity of students to express themselves at the university was never the same again.

On June 23, 2022, a week after the death incident, Makerere University held the annual Frank Kalimuzo memorial lecture in celebration of the former Vice Chancellor’s contribution and sacrifice towards academia in Uganda.

Dr Kalimuzo had been the first indigenous Vice Chancellor of Makerere University appointed by President Apollo Milton Obote. Shortly, after his appointment, Idd Amin overthrew Obote in January 1971. Amin’s leadership would be characterised by abductions and extra-judicial killings. 

In 1972, Kalimuzo would be picked up by security personnel never to be seen alive again. Other academics including Mahmood Mamdani, Robert Serumaga, George Kanyeihamba, and Dan Nabudele, would escape into exile. Some joined political groupings that later kicked Amin out of office. The Obote II government provided a short sigh of relief but later relapsed.

The 1986 capture of power by the National Resistance Army under Yoweri Museveni promised a new dawn. For academics, it was a time to flourish. This culminated in the hosting of a continental conference on academic freedoms in 1990 that resulted into the Kampala Declaration.

The Cold War had ended thereby marking a new epoch in the trajectory of African states. As decolonisation had spread through much of the continent, the struggle against apartheid was underway. The likes of Mamadou Diouf, Mahmood Mamdani, Arthur Mafeje, and other African intellectuals wrote about this new trajectory in their works such as the Academic Freedom in Africa that emerged from the declaration. In this sense, Uganda was hoisted as the centre of intellectual freedom on the continent.

The process that sought to establish a new national consensus was initiated. Consultations on the aggregate aspirations of the citizens were in high gear. In 1995, a new constitution was promulgated. While academic freedoms were not exclusively defined, they were provided for in the broader provisions like Article 29 on the right of expression and Article 30 on the right to education. 

But shortly things started changing. 

End of Part I

How Makerere erased our freedoms – Part 2